Paper: “Implementation of Control Standards in an Organization”

RTM-2 — Paper: “Implementation of Control Standards in an Organization”
Class: Monday Class


RTM-2 — Project Evaluation & Learning Notes (Monday Class)

This page provides the official recap of RTM-2 scores and structured feedback to help students learn from common weaknesses and improve academic writing quality, analytical structure, and compliance with RTM requirements.


1) How to Read the Feedback Codes

Each student is assigned one main feedback code that reflects the most important improvement area based on the assessor note.

Feedback Code Dictionary

  • K1 — Narrative / not measurable: Needs KPIs, formulas, scoring/weighting matrix, or clearer quantified evaluation.
  • K2 — References & citations: Needs improvement in recency (≤5 years), number of sources, citation style consistency, or bibliography completeness.
  • K3 — Incomplete submission / missing core parts: Missing essential components (e.g., only PPT, no references, very limited data, incomplete structure).
  • K4 — Format / RTM instruction compliance: Format is not aligned with RTM instructions (e.g., “makalah” format, layout issues, inconsistent structure).
  • K5 — Writing quality / consistency: Needs proofreading and consistency (typos, repetition, inconsistent terms/labels, unclear data alignment).

2) What Usually Made Scores Higher in RTM-2

High-scoring papers typically had:

  • Clear structure aligned with RTM expectations (not only “makalah” style)
  • Evidence-based explanation of control standards implementation
  • Measurable evaluation: KPIs + a simple scoring/weighting approach
  • Recent scholarly references (dominantly ≤5 years) and consistent citation style
  • Clean technical writing: consistent labels, tables/figures, and proofreading

3) Common Issues & How to Fix Them

K1 — Narrative / not measurable

Fix checklist: define 4–6 KPIs, add formula/measurement, score alternatives, and summarize results in a matrix.

K2 — References & citations

Fix checklist: add recent journal sources, avoid outdated-only references (e.g., 2014/2017/2019 dominating), and use one style consistently (recommended: APA 7th).

K3 — Incomplete submission

Fix checklist: submit full paper (not PPT only), include citations + bibliography, and ensure minimum RTM sections are present.

K4 — Format not compliant with RTM instructions

Fix checklist: follow RTM formatting rules (structure, headings, required sections). Avoid “makalah-only” format if RTM requires an RTM structure.

K5 — Writing quality / consistency issues

Fix checklist: remove repeated lines, fix typos, standardize terms, and ensure data statements match tables/claims.


4) RTM-2 Score Recap — Complete Student List (Monday Class)

NoStudent ID (NIM)Student NameFinal ScoreShort Assessor NoteCode
164250007AL VICKY JULMANSYAH83.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
264250012ILMA FATIMAH83.00“Makalah” format; uses 2014 reference.K2
364250022KINANTI PUTRI RAHMANIA80.00Logical flow; references 2021–2022.K0
464250036RHAMADAN INDA ROBBI87.90Uses 2024–2025 references; minor KPI/formula issues.K1
564250040KURNIA ILMA IKFIYAH86.00Complete structure; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
664250042MAESYAH NURAMELIA82.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
764250067JUWITA KHOIRULISA84.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
864250073JAVANI NABHILA AZZAHRA84.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
964250085ZEVANIA CHRIS ALLANT SARAGIH86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
1064250087MARCELLA PRILIANTY72.00PPT only; no citations/bibliography.K3
1164250097REI RAHMAN FAUDZI90.00Complete analysis; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
1264250109DHEA CHAERINA ZULYANTI82.00Neat; references 2020/2021.K0
1364250118ANDRA YANI84.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
1464250126ZAHRA SALSABILA83.00“Makalah” format; uses 2014 reference.K2
1564250128SINTYA SURYANI DEWI78.00Old references; limited data.K2
1664250140CAMILA KANZA THETTA RAHIMAH80.00Logical flow; references 2021–2022.K0
1764250144AS SYAUKAN SRI DANO IMRON82.00Neat; references 2020/2021.K0
1864250156RACHELIA FEBIYANTI82.00Neat; references 2020/2021.K0
1964250177DANAR DWI ASTOMO86.30Clear GAP–5 Why; many outdated references.K2
2064250181RIZKA ALIFIA NOVARINA72.00PPT only; no citations/bibliography.K3
2164250187NOVITRIYANI DIRA SUPRIATNA82.00Neat; references 2020/2021.K0
2264250212SITI ALFARISYA82.00Neat; references 2020/2021.K0
2364250218RAIHAN AL ARROYAN86.30KPI & data complete; ≤5-year references not met.K2
2464250224NASYWA TAJALI AL’AIN83.00“Makalah” format; uses 2014 reference.K2
2564250225MUHAMAD DHIMAS RAMADHANNI87.90References 2023–2025 included; KPI/formulas need tidying.K1
2664250233ADINDA MAYSA76.00Old references & placeholder sources.K3
2764250234SABRIANA76.00Old references & placeholder sources.K3
2864250241POPY AGIS FIRZATULLAH72.00PPT only; no citations/bibliography.K3
2964250242NATASYA ARYANTY90.00Complete analysis; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
3064250243NADIRA RAHMADANI. SM90.00Complete analysis; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
3164250245REVALIA ASSAN80.00Logical flow; references 2021–2022.K0
3264250249NABILA SEPTI ROMADHONI86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
3364250252RENALDI PATI NGGUMBE87.90References are acceptable; KPI/formulas need tidying.K1
3464250255WINANSYAH86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
3564250261ATHALLAH REHANDO EKA RADITYO86.30Logical structure; references mostly 2017–2018.K2
3664250270MUHAMMAD IVAN ZEIN87.90Recent references included; formula accuracy needs work.K1
3764250288LAURA SYAHNANDA ZULFIA80.00Logical flow; references 2021–2022.K0
3864250302VALLIN AL ZAHARA78.00Old references; limited data.K2
3964250319RISMIA ALDELIA PANE83.00“Makalah” format; uses 2014 reference.K2
4064250337SHABILA MUSYAQINAH80.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
4164250341SYAFIQ NAUFAL AFANDI90.00Complete analysis; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
4264250356SYIFAA ANNISA ZALFAA76.00Old references & placeholder sources.K3
4364250362IRENE DWI ALIZA84.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
4464250383MUHAMMAD FAIDHLUL MA’ARIF86.30SOP→KPI→data→gap→improvement consistent; outdated references.K2
4564250400NADYA KHAIRANI80.00Logical flow; references 2021–2022.K0
4664250411DENAYLA FARENISA90.00Complete analysis; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
4764250429SAFIRA NOVELIA72.00PPT only; no citations/bibliography.K3
4864250438CHELSY NACILA MELATI PUTRI JAYA78.00Old references; limited data.K2
4964250451IBNU RESTU SANTOSO87.90References relatively recent; KPI formulas incomplete.K1
5064250463ZOYA NASHIFA SETIAWAN78.00Old references; limited data.K2
5164250471ERICK ADENIO ADENIO RIZOIN HAFIDZ72.00PPT only; no citations/bibliography.K3
5264250472YULIA NUR SATRIANI86.00Complete structure; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
5364250474NANDA ZHAHWA KHOIRUNNISSA86.00Complete structure; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
5464250483ADINDA SALWA SYAHIRA78.00Old references; limited data.K2
5564250491DILLA ARLIANA76.00Old references & placeholder sources.K3
5664250492CHINTYA APRILIA PUTRI76.00Old references & placeholder sources.K3
5764250498INDIRA NARESA PUTRI86.00Complete structure; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
5864250500RASYA PUTRA RIZKYANTO86.30Measurable actions; not enough recent references.K2
5964250511MELANI ZULQIA WARDANI86.00Complete structure; still labeled as “makalah”.K4
6064250543TALITHA SYIFA80.00Fictional dataset; instructions not consistently followed.K3
6164250556MAESYILA AZHARA75.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
6264250563SALWA AMALINDA80.002020 references & simulated data.K2
6364250566CHYNTHIA AFRILLIA82.00Complete structure; references dominated by 2019.K2
6464250571NAZWA PUTRI NABILA84.00Includes 2019 references (>5 years).K2
6564250583ASHILAH FATHIYYA NABILAH78.00Writing consistency issues (typos/repetition).K5
6664250588CINDY RAMADHANI RIEFWANTI86.40Strong time–satisfaction analysis; minor reference recency issue.K2
6764250609REZA ADI PUTRA86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
6864250611MARCELLA ALLIVIANI MULYONO TOBING82.00Complete structure; references dominated by 2019.K2
6964250614RIZQIKA PUTRI HUDANI80.00KPI–gap exists; fictional dataset; inconsistent instruction compliance.K3
7064250617NAYLA PUTRI RAHMA NOVIANTI88.00Complete analysis; recent references.K0
7164250644MUTIA DWI SABRINA88.90Meets rubric; references 2020–2023; terminology consistency needed.K5
7264250645RIZKA WIDYA PUSPITA82.00Complete structure; references dominated by 2019.K2
7364250657SITI NOVITA SARI78.00Writing consistency issues (typos/repetition).K5
7464250664SENIA DEWI PAMELA74.00References older than 5 years.K2
7564250665LINA AULIA74.00References older than 5 years.K2
7664250686SYAFIRA GHINA KHALILAH86.40Neat; clear data+gap; references dominated by 2017–2019.K2
7764250687DWI PRASETYO77.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
7864250700NADINE SAYIDA RAHMAN83.00Strong analysis; references 2021.K0
7964250722SHELVY SURYA ALLATHIIF88.90Concrete improvement plan; minor typos/formatting.K5
8064250736SYELLEN BEAUTY LISTIANISA80.00KPI–gap exists; fictional dataset; inconsistent instruction compliance.K3
8164250742MEYSIA AULIA PUTRI76.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
8264250746FIRZA MALIKA CHATAMI SULAEMAN83.00Strong analysis; references 2021.K0
8364250755DINAR KEIZIA NURAZIZAH80.002020 references & simulated data.K2
8464250756MONICA SAPUTRI86.40Concrete improvement plan; references ≤5 years not strong enough.K2
8564250758ALYA SALMA KAMILA84.00Includes 2019 references (>5 years).K2
8664250760FRANSISKUS SIMANULANG72.00Old and duplicated references.K2
8764250768ALYA SALSABILA86.40KPI+1-week data+gap; references dominated by 2017–2019.K2
8864250776ADE PUTRI AULIA83.00Strong analysis; references 2021.K0
8964250781ZULAYKA LATIFA ZIHAN83.00Strong analysis; references 2021.K0
9064250782AMANDHA ANNAS NATASYA78.00Writing consistency issues (typos/repetition).K5
9164250783NUR FANISAHILLA88.00Complete analysis; recent references.K0
9264250796ZAHRA HUMAIRA82.00Complete structure; references dominated by 2019.K2
9364250823DIVA PUTRI AURELIA TRIYANTO88.90Detailed gaps per KPI; measurable plan; minor typos.K5
9464250826MUHAMMAD RAFID RABBANI72.00Old and duplicated references.K2
9564250831SHEIRA MAULIDA PUTRI80.002020 references & simulated data.K2
9664250833AYU SAFITRI80.002020 references & simulated data.K2
9764250834RAHMANIA TRIANI RAHMASARI80.00KPI–gap exists; fictional dataset; inconsistent instruction compliance.K3
9864250838DINDA OLIVIA88.90Complete structure; strong RCA; refs 2020–2023; minor typos.K5
9964250853IRMA WATI74.00References older than 5 years.K2
10064250858RIZKY RAMADANA PUTRA86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
10164250859MUHAMMAD ZIDNI FADHLANScore not provided in the input.
10264250867ARINI REVALIA PUTRI80.00KPI–gap exists; fictional dataset; inconsistent instruction compliance.K3
10364250869GHINA NAYLA ALFARAH80.002020 references & simulated data.K2
10464250874MIA DWI SUSANTI78.00Writing consistency issues (typos/repetition).K5
10564250901DINDA INTAN NURAINI72.00References >5 years and duplicated.K2
10664250914NUR SYIFA RAHMADONA88.00Complete analysis; recent references.K0
10764250915FIRIYAL AZKIA86.40Consistent KPI + PDCA; references dominated by older sources.K2
10864250916LANYA SUBIYANTO78.00Writing consistency issues (typos/repetition).K5
10964250923SYAQIRA HERREL84.00Includes 2019 references (>5 years).K2
11064250925NINDA ULYA RAHMA84.00Includes 2019 references (>5 years).K2
11164250928FITA HANA KHAIRINA88.90Clear SLA; strong RCA; minor typos.K5
11264250934MUHAMAD REZA RAMADHAN86.00Uses 2020 reference.K2
11364250940RAYA ACHMADIYOSO72.00Old and duplicated references.K2
11464250941ALPI YANSYAH77.00Format & citations do not follow instructions well.K4
11564250956DEVA AYU OCTAVIA RAMADHANI88.00Complete analysis; recent references.K0
11664250967CHAIRUNISA RAMADHANI74.00References older than 5 years.K2
11764250977SALWA FITRIYAH74.00References older than 5 years.K2
11864251420ILONA ASVIKA82.00Complete structure; references dominated by 2019.K2
11964251585SUCI RAMADHANI ISLAMI84.00Includes 2019 references (>5 years).K2
12064251874NOVA MARIA ULFA83.00“Makalah” format; uses 2014 reference.K2

5) Students with Missing Scores

  • 64250859 — MUHAMMAD ZIDNI FADHLAN: (no score provided in the input)