Final Grade Breakdown & Project Evaluation Notes (Tuesday Class)

This page is published to ensure transparency and to help students learn from common mistakes in academic writing and project-based reporting. Your final grade is not only a number—it reflects how consistently you met the course standards across attendance discipline, project/RTM quality, and other assessed components.

How the Final Grade Is Calculated

• Attendance Contribution (20%): consistency of attendance and participation records.
• Project/RTM Contribution (55%): the core quality of your RTM reports/projects (structure, analysis, evidence, KPI, and academic integrity).
• Additional Contribution (25%): other assessment component(s) used in the class policy.

Final Score = (20% Attendance) + (55% Project/RTM) + (25% Quiz)
The breakdown below is provided so each student can see which component most affected the final result.

---

Final Score Table (With Breakdown)

Nama	Absensi (20%)	Project (55%)	Quiz(25%)	Nilai Akhir
NABILLA MARSYA	18,67	47,751	22	89
FANI ANGRRAINI SAFITRI ANINGSIH	18,67	45,991	22	87
KHALIZA FATHIA ACHMAD	18,67	31,559	24	74
MUAMAR NABIL DWI SAPUTRO	12	29,37	15	56
ALSYAFHAN DANI RAMADHAN	18,67	46,904	17	83
NAJWA AULIA	18,67	47,8115	17	84
ASYILA NAILA ALIFAH	17,33	48,114	21	87
NADIA SAFIRA	18,67	47,8115	24	90
NABILA SALSABILA	18,67	31,559	23	73
MUHAMMAD OKAN KHADAFI PUNY	10,67	30,6185	23	64
MARGARETA VERONIKA SIMALANGO	18,67	47,751	22	88
MUHAMMAD RAHMAN HIDAYAT	17,33	47,124	22	86
MUHAMMAD RIDHO NAUFAL	13,33	26,5815	22	62
ANDINNA DESWITA	14,67	45,815	19	80
FAUZIAH NUR MUTMAINAH	16	15,224	23	54
CUT DESI	18,67	30,404	23	72
AZAHRA NANDA AULIA	16	15,224	22	53
VITA TAMALA PUTRI	18,67	45,991	24	88
YOSUA NATANAEL PARDOMUAN SIMBOLON	14,67	47,751	22	85
JEANNY OLIVIA	18,67	48,114	23	90
SYABRINA RAISYA KUMALA DEWA	17,33	30,404	24	71
JENSEN ALDIANO	14,67	41,239	24	80
ELGA ARUM ANJANI	16	31,559	24	71
MARSHANDA	16	45,815	12	74
YUSUF APRILIANO P SIHITE	16	29,37	7	53
INTAN NURAENI	16	47,8115	20	84
RAJIB MUHAMMAD LATIF	17,33	41,239	23	81
FAARUQ KHODAFI	17,33	45,8425	23	86
NAYLA TSABITHA DAMAYANTI	16	45,991	23	85
SASKIA PUTRI	17,33	45,815	22	85
RICO DAMARA	14,67	30,6185	23	68
NGISOMUDIN	16	29,7385	22	68
SAHLA NABIL	16	48,114	18	82
FARHAN HIDAYAT	17,33	47,124	23	88

---

General Project Evaluation (What Most Affects Scores)

1) The 55% Project/RTM component is the main “grade driver”

In many cases, the largest score differences came from the 55% Project/RTM contribution.
Students with strong final grades typically showed:

• clear structure (problem → analysis → evidence → decision → conclusion),
• measurable outputs (KPI/targets),
• operational recommendations (steps, timeline, risk mitigation),
• consistent academic writing.

2) Common mistakes that lowered Project/RTM scores

Across multiple submissions, recurring weaknesses were:

• Narrative-only writing (describing without measurable KPI/targets),
• generic recommendations (no “what exactly, how, who, and when”),
• weak evidence (claims without credible sources),
• inconsistent format (citations/references mixed, headings messy),
• unfinished sections (placeholders, missing tables/attachments).

3) Attendance helps—but it cannot fully “rescue” a weak project score

A strong attendance contribution (20%) supports the final score, but if the Project/RTM contribution is low, the final score will still drop significantly. The same applies to the additional 25% component: strong performance helps, but the report quality remains crucial.

---

Quick Improvement Checklist (Before Submitting Future Projects)

Use this as a final check:

1. Is the problem specific (organization + process + measurable symptoms)?
2. Did you include evidence/data (even a small dataset)?
3. Are KPI written with targets and time period (not only “improve/increase”)?
4. Are recommendations operational (steps + timeline + risk mitigation)?
5. Are citations and references consistent (one style only)?
6. Is the document final-ready (no placeholders, clean tables/figures)?