This page publishes the RTM-3 results for the Wednesday Morning class. The purpose is transparency and academic improvement: students can verify their score, understand what was done well, and learn how to improve the next paper—especially on using official sources, building an argument (not just a description), and maintaining academic integrity.
Key Notes
- Same score for one team: if the uploaded report is the same, all members receive the same score.
- If a student’s name/NIM does not appear in the RTM-3 submission dataset, the score is marked T (To be confirmed).
- T means the work was not identified in the submitted dataset (team/title not matched yet) and will be updated after valid data is received.
RTM-3 Score List (Wednesday Morning)
| No. | NIM | Name (Reference List) | Final Score | RTM-3 Title | Short Note (Specific, high-integrity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64251872 | FATHIR NUR RAMADHAN | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 2 | 64251884 | RIZKYA RACHMALIANA | 88 | Vision & Mission of PT PLN | Uses official PLN sources; complete keywords + business environment mapping; program examples per function included; integrity is evident. |
| 3 | 64251899 | MUHAMMAD FAARI RAKA ADISEPUTRO | 82 | Vision–Mission Analysis of PT Indomarco Prismatama | Core structure is present, but still brief (few specific programs/policies and limited analytical depth); integrity is evident. |
| 4 | 64251902 | RIYADH AHMAD MUDZAKIR | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 5 | 64251910 | ANASTASIA JEVIKA BEREK | 88 | Vision & Mission of PT PLN | Clear mapping of customers–competitors–regulators–technology; organizational functions aligned with examples; integrity is evident. |
| 6 | 64251912 | CUT ZALIANTI | 88 | Vision & Mission of PT PLN | Valid official source; extraction of values/value promise/strategic direction is clear; functional mapping (marketing/ops/HR/finance) included; integrity is evident. |
| 7 | 64251928 | SALWA NAFINGA | 88 | Vision & Mission of PT PLN | Business environment analysis is relevant (alternative energy/regulation); policy examples per function included; integrity is evident. |
| 8 | 64251953 | DEWI AGUSTINE PRABOWO | 78 | Vision & Mission of Tokopedia | Sources are mostly secondary (e.g., Wikipedia/thesis); systematic but program examples remain generic; integrity is evident. |
| 9 | 64251967 | GENDIS AYU LARASATI | 78 | Vision & Mission of Tokopedia | Keywords + environment mapping exist; however the vision–mission reference is not from an official corporate document; integrity is evident. |
| 10 | 64251985 | SABILLAH FASQAL | 82 | Vision–Mission Analysis of PT Indomarco Prismatama | Summary + environment mapping exist; implementation examples are still general (promo/member/training) without concrete program detail; integrity is evident. |
| 11 | 64252009 | REZA ADHITYA PRATAMA PUTRA | 90 | Vision–Mission of Local Marketplaces & Impact on UMKM Empowerment (Tokopedia) | Very complete: clear documents/sources; detailed business environment mapping; function alignment includes programs + rating/gap; integrity is evident. |
| 12 | 64252037 | ROBIATUL ADAWIYAH | 84 | Vision–Mission Alignment of PT KAI (Persero) | Official link included; keywords + environment mapping exist; programs mentioned (KAI Access, OTP) but still brief; integrity is evident. |
| 13 | 64252048 | ADINDA DWI NOVITA | 90 | Vision–Mission of Local Marketplaces & Impact on UMKM Empowerment (Tokopedia) | Highly detailed functional analysis + concrete program examples; environment mapping is strong; integrity is evident. |
| 14 | 64252057 | SINDI MEYOLA BR SEMBIRING | 90 | Vision–Mission of Local Marketplaces & Impact on UMKM Empowerment (Tokopedia) | Very high completeness (concrete programs, KPI ideas, trade-offs such as monetization vs mission); integrity is evident. |
| 15 | 64252081 | KHANSA PRAYUDATI FATHINAH | 78 | Vision & Mission of Tokopedia | Structure is met; however sources are not official documents (more academic references); program examples remain generic; integrity is evident. |
| 16 | 64252084 | RAHMAD RISKIANTO | 82 | Vision–Mission Analysis of PT Indomarco Prismatama | Environment mapping exists; functional implementation exists but lacks specific program/policy detail; integrity is evident. |
| 17 | 64252099 | YODI RAMADANI | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 18 | 64252104 | REGITA LESTARI | 84 | Vision–Mission Alignment of PT KAI (Persero) | Official KAI source used; environment mapping is relevant; function alignment exists but program examples are still limited; integrity is evident. |
| 19 | 64252113 | JUANITA RESTIAH ASTUTI | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 20 | 64252117 | NADIN JANIA NURHAYATI | 84 | Vision–Mission Alignment of PT KAI (Persero) | Keywords + organizational functions exist; still brief (few policy/indicator reinforcements); integrity is evident. |
| 21 | 64252131 | FAISAL HILMI JAYALAKSANA | 90 | Vision–Mission of Local Marketplaces & Impact on UMKM Empowerment (Tokopedia) | Very detailed customers–competitors–regulators–technology mapping; function implementation includes concrete programs; integrity is evident. |
| 22 | 64252134 | FEBBY AFRAWATI SAHIDU | 78 | Vision & Mission of Tokopedia | Main components exist; however the vision–mission reference is not an official corporate document; program examples are not sharp; integrity is evident. |
| 23 | 64252147 | SYALWA WIBOWO | 86 | Evaluating Pertamina’s Vision–Mission for Energy Security & Sustainability | Source link included; AKHLAK keywords + strategic direction extracted well; function-level implementation examples included; integrity is evident. |
| 24 | 64252148 | DESWITA AISYAH | 86 | Evaluating Pertamina’s Vision–Mission for Energy Security & Sustainability | Business environment mapping is brief but relevant; functions supported with program examples; integrity is evident. |
| 25 | 64252155 | ANISA PUTRI NUR INDAH SARI | 84 | Vision–Mission Alignment of PT KAI (Persero) | Analytical structure present; programs cited (KAI Access, non-ticket diversification) but still brief; integrity is evident. |
| 26 | 64252156 | HAMALIN HABIB HASIBUAN | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 27 | 64252161 | INSANUL HAKIM | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 28 | 64252163 | ANGGIT SETIAWAN | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 29 | 64252167 | RASHIKA ZAKIA ZAHRA | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 30 | 64252168 | NAYSILLA AZZAHRA | 86 | Evaluating Pertamina’s Vision–Mission for Energy Security & Sustainability | Vision–mission + strategic keywords are clear; function examples provided; competitor/technology mapping needs deeper analysis; integrity is evident. |
| 31 | 64252173 | NAYLA FITRI ZASKIA | 86 | Evaluating Pertamina’s Vision–Mission for Energy Security & Sustainability | Complete structure; functional alignment present; business environment mapping still brief; integrity is evident. |
| 32 | 64252184 | BALQIS FITRIAH ALAWIYAH | T | — | Not found in the RTM-3 dataset submitted (team/title not identified yet). |
| 33 | 64252193 | NATHANAEL VIGGO PAIRUNAN | 82 | Vision–Mission Analysis of PT Indomarco Prismatama | Brief: environment + functions are present, but lacks concrete program examples/indicators; integrity is evident. |
General Evaluation (What Students Should Learn from RTM-3)
Overall, the stronger RTM-3 papers were those that treated “vision–mission” as an argument that must be proven, not just a definition to be repeated. High-scoring reports typically used official corporate sources, extracted keywords, mapped the business environment (customers, competitors, regulators, technology), and then connected those findings to function-level strategy (marketing/operations/HR/finance) with concrete programs.
Common Strengths (Usually 86–90)
- Uses official sources (company website/annual report/official statements).
- Clear keyword extraction and consistent linkage to environment + functions.
- Provides program examples per function, not just generic “improve service”.
- Keeps integrity: claims are traceable to sources, not copied without citation.
Common Weaknesses (Often 78–84)
- Uses secondary sources for vision–mission (Wikipedia, unrelated papers) instead of official documents.
- Program examples remain generic, with little detail and no measurable indicators.
- Mapping is present but too brief (lists elements without deeper interpretation).
- Some teams “follow the template” but do not truly analyze (the argument does not grow from evidence).
Fast Self-Check for Future RTM-3
Before submitting, confirm:
- Did I quote/derive vision–mission from an official corporate document?
- Did I extract keywords and link them to environment factors?
- Did I connect each key idea to function-level programs (with specifics)?
- Are all sources and figures traceable and properly cited?